I have an actual issue with Evolutionary Psychology, and it goes right to the focus of the discipline: it’s designed on a defective foundation. It depends on a naive and simple knowing of how progress works. It attracts many individuals, though, because that false impression adjusts perfectly with the animated version of progress in most individuals’ leads, and it also indicates that whenever you criticize Evolutionary Psychology, you get a horde of uninformed defenders who believe you are fighting progress itself. That false impression is adaptationism.
In a desolate effort to prevent the humming mob that will instantly accuse me of creationism and of doubting organic choice that does not mean that I think choice is insignificant or not essential. It does not mean that I think other ways of progress are more essential. It indicates that there is a huge selection of systems that all perform an essential part in progress, and that you cannot basically imagine that one is all that counts. Not admiring the value of these other systems is a bit like being an electrical engineer who believes that voltage is all that matters, and level of resistance and current can be ignored.
In particular, unique inherited move, the difference in inhabitants caused by choosing mistakes, is far more important than most individuals (including most transformative psychologists) believe. Most of the apparent phenotypic difference we see in individuals, for example, is not an item of selection: your nasal area does not have the form it does, which varies from my nasal area, which varies from Barack Obama’s nasal area, which varies from Henry Takei’s nasal area, because we individually come down from communities which had extremely varying styles of natural and sex-related choice for nasal area shape; no, what we’re seeing are opportunity modifications increased in regularity by flow in different communities.