Tag: sociology of taste

Role of Sociology in Nursing

Nursing is more than just taking blood samples, recording patient data or assisting the physician. Nurses are well-educated and prepared to handle sophisticated tasks and procedures to best assist the patients towards recovery. Additionally, learning the medical terms as well as the procedures is not their only job. Nurses, to be more effective, must be able to learn the proper way of approaching their patients. They must also be able to understand how people think, feel and react. This may seem like a job for a psychologist, but it is very important to be able to provide quality and effective health care services.

As a nurse, you will be able to experience different types of patients with different health issues and from different social backgrounds. Patients react differently on a particular condition or medication which will have a direct impact on their recovery. Through the knowledge of sociology, nurses will be able to look past what is obvious. It will give them another perspective of the situation which will give an idea on what approach or medication to take.

Incorporating sociology in nursing helps develop skills that will make nurses provide nursing care to patients in a more effective way by considering many other factors and forces that directly affect recovery and care. Determining the factors that may hinder recovery or promote it may help avoid malpractice and fast track recovery.

The fast recoveries of the patients don’t just depend on the quality of the medicines the patient took or the use of the advanced medical facilities, it also depends on how well the nurses determine the true needs of the patient.

Sociology Overload

We reside in the growing mainstream time of the sociology of taste. Think back to the very first time you observed someone gently discuss of “cultural capital” at a gathering, usually another person’s inglorious desire or accumulation of it; or when you first observed someone compliment “the subversion of the dominant in a cultural field,” or use the terms develop a plan, settle, placement, or utilizing in a conversation of a much popular “cultural producer’s” profession. You might have believed that you were listening to Walls Street lenders detail mergers and products, but these were English majors!

This increase of sociological thinking has led to sociological living, ways of considering and seeing that are designed to be able to bring out, yet somehow evade, the persistent demystification sociology needs. Seeing art as a product, mere stuff, rather than a work, has become a sign of a good liberal mind-set. Too often, being on the left tasks you with a cautious everyday desire to prevent being marked with snobbery. And yet despite this everlasting reevaluation of all principles, the actual public purchase seems unchanged; the feeling of it all being a game not only continues, but solidifies.

The preliminary demystifying shock of the sociology of life in the academia partially accounts for its reputation. Thanks to the dead ends of certain types of European hermeneutics, the understanding that recurring studies of Balzac novellas might not tremble the fundamentals of the topic, let alone those of capitalism.  It became more appealing to ask why certain classes of individuals might be fascinated (and other classes not interested) in Balzac at all. No more appeals to the mysterious characteristics of genius. Seen from the longue durée of social change, individual authors or works were less essential than collectives or status groups, places or techniques. Like latter-day Northrop Fryes, equipped with information, the critic-sociologists transformed authors back into “literature” as a program, and from there into refractions of requirements, organizations and classes.